Death of Jesus history event counterfeit

The Death of Jesus

Did Jesus have Passover dinner?

By Jack M Samardzija

"Pilate saith unto him, What is truth?"

John 18:38

The traditional Jewish calendar of the first century AD was lunar, in which the first day of each month was determined by when the light of the new crescent moon became visible in Jerusalem shortly after sunset or better said just under 80 minutes after sunset, the full moon rising about two weeks later. It was perhaps natural, therefore, that the setting sun should signify the end of the day and sunset/dusk the beginning of a new one, which extended to sunset/dusk the next day (night and day, rather than day and night;  Genesis 1:5, "And the evening and morning were the first day"). Friday, for example, began at sunset/dusk on Thursday and ended at sunset on Friday, which was the beginning of Saturday, the Jewish Sabbath. 

Although the notion of a new day beginning on the evening of the previous one is potentially confusing, it really is not so different than one beginning at midnight six hours later as this one is confusing as well.

This is the classic teaching but there is a fundamental fault with this description of events, however we will get back to this point let's look at Jewish and Roman customs and their ability to reference history.

Daylight hours, however, still were measured from sunrise (6 a.m.). The third hour was 9 a.m.; the sixth hour, 12 noon; and the ninth hour, 3 p.m. An event that occurred just before sunset (the twelfth hour, 6 p.m.) was counted as taking place on that day and, after sunset, the next. 

Even if moments old, a portion of a day counted as the whole—and so in the Jerusalem Talmud "day and night each are a term, and part of a term is like the whole" (Shabbat, IX.3). It is important to remember, too, that days were counted inclusively and that both the first and last day were included in calculating their passage.

As God commanded Moses, "The first month of the year to you" (Exodus 12:2) was to be Nisan, which corresponds to March/April (just as the vernal equinox on March 25 was the beginning of the new year in the early Roman calendar). A lamb was to be kept "until the fourteenth day of the same month" til dusk(Exodus 12:6, Leviticus 23:5, Numbers 28:16) when, that evening, it was to be sacrificed and eaten with bread and bitter herbs (Exodus 12:8), on what then was the fifteenth day of the month.

Please note; the lamb was to be kept until the 14th day and “at EVENING DUSK” it was to be sacrificed and eaten.

This was the Passover feast commemorating the exodus of the Israelites from Egypt, who had marked their doorposts with the blood of a lamb so God’s/Angel would pass over them. One of the "feasts of the Lord, even holy convocations, which ye shall proclaim in their seasons" (Leviticus 23:4), it could fall on any day of the week but was especially sacred when it coincided with the Sabbath, another holy convocation (23:3). And, just as God had "rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made" (Genesis 2:2), so too the Sabbath was to be a day in which "thou shalt not do any work" (Exodus 20:10; Leviticus 23:3)—as was the first day of the ensuing week-long Feast of Unleavened Bread that followed the Passover (Leviticus 23:7, Deuteronomy16:3). Whilst they claim it can fall on any day of the week in reality this is wrong as 14th day of Nisan is always 14th day, yet when compared with Roman calendar then it can fall on any day depending on the year as it changes every year, similar to Easter floating.

For the Passover meal to be celebrated on the Sabbath 14th day evening many claim that it was to be prepared on the 13th day of Nisan supposedly being Friday. . This 13th day was the Day of Preparation day, in which they might have  prepared other stuff but God was clear in (Exodus 12:6, Leviticus 23:5, Numbers 28:16 with his instructions to chose the lamb and on the 14th at Dusk to have it slaughtered and eaten. Later that evening—in the twilight after sundown and the rising of the full moon on what then was Nisan 15th, the beginning of Passover day. (Twilight itself is that period between sunset and the appearance of the first stars in the evening sky, when the crescent moon would be visible.)

The Gospels all agree that Jesus died on a Friday, this in my mind creates big problem , either Jesus had a passover dinner at wrong date or Gospels are wrong in their description of events.

Here is my reasoning, at the time of Jesus’s crucifixion Roman calendar had 8 day week starting with the letter A and ending with H, current pagan names of the days became much latter after the crucifixion simply because neither friday or sunday existed within the 8 day week.

 (Matthew 27:62, Mark 15:42, Luke 23:54, John 19:42), that he shared a Last Supper with his disciples the evening before, and was crucified the next day , these event in this paragraph reason with the true events, but we must open our mind to maximum to absorb or dismiss what they are telling us. Namely history tells us that Jesus had Passover dinner on the evening of the 14th beginning of 15th day, also bible tells us that he was crucified on the 15th day of Nisan and first day of unleaded bread. So can someone with relevant intelligence point me in the direction of Friday, Saturday or Sunday.  Evening ending the 14th day and beginning of the 15th day corresponds to 14th being last day of the week (sabbath or biblical 7th day) and 15th day being first day of biblical week. How then could Jesus be crucified on Friday and risen on Sunday or better question is at that time which friday or which sunday?

According to the bible in part Jesus was crucified on the 15th day of the month and first day of the week, so his first night in the grave would have been evening ending of the 15th day and the beginning of the 16th day, same again ending the 16th day and the beginning 17th day and lastly ending 17th beginning of 18th day, so to simplify Jesus spend 16, 17 and 18 nights in the grave and he would have to be resurrected prior to end of the 18th day. This would fulfil the prophecy of Jesus being in the grave 3 nights and 3 days.

Did you notice an important issue, from 14th day to 21st day is seven days, 14th was Shabbat and so was 21st, which day was 18th day (beside being middle of the week)?

These events occurred in the reign of Tiberius (AD 14–37), when Pontius Pilate was prefect of Judaea (AD 26–36); Caiaphas, high priest in Jerusalem (circa AD 18–36); and Herod Antipas, tetrarch of Galilee (circa 4 BC–AD 39) (Tacitus, Annals, XV.44; Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews, XVIII.2.2, XVII.8.1; Luke 3:1–2).

But there is disagreement as to whether Jesus died before or after this last supper and whether it truly was a Passover meal. In the Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke; so named because they share a similar narrative, in contrast to John), Jesus is said to have been crucified and died after the Passover meal on what then was Passover day (Nisan 15). In the Gospel of John, he died before the Passover while it still was being prepared (Nisan 14). The question in minds of some scholars is whether that Friday was the Day of Passover or the Day of Preparation. Well i dont think they have reached the level of worry yet.

Mark was the first Gospel to be written, sometime before the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70 when, on Passover that year, the Romans laid siege to the city, destroying the Second Temple four months later (Josephus, The Jewish War, V.3.1, VI.4.8; cf. Mark 13:2, "there shall not be left one stone upon another, that shall not be thrown down"). He recounts that, on "the first day of unleavened bread, when they killed the passover [lamb]," the disciples asked Jesus where they were to prepare the meal "that thou mayest eat the passover" (14:12; also Matthew 26:17; Luke 22:15, "I have desired to eat this passover with you before I suffer").

Preparations for a last supper were duly made and that evening, at what both Jesus and his disciples describe as a Passover meal, Jesus took the bread and broke it (as his own body would be broken) and then the wine, signifying the shedding of his own blood. Afterwards, Jesus and his disciples went out to the Mount of Olives and then to the Garden of Gethsemane (Mark 14:26, 32), where he was betrayed by Judas and arrested. 

Tried before the high priest and the assembled chief priests, elders, and scribes (Sanhedrin) (14:53), Jesus was sort of found guilty by Pontius Pilate and crucified the same day at "the third hour" (9 a.m.) on Passover day (15:25). Given the prolonged agony of crucifixion, Jesus died later that afternoon at the ninth hour (3 p.m.) (15:34, Matthew 27:46, Luke 23:44). ("Excruciating," coincidentally, derives from the Latin crux, "cross.")

John was the last Gospel to be written, about twenty-five years later. He relates that Jesus died "before the feast of the passover, when Jesus knew that his hour was come that he should depart out of this world unto the Father" (13:1). There was no preparation for a Passover meal nor mention of a communion; rather, "supper being ended," Jesus washed the feet of his disciples (13:2, 5) and, echoing Moses, gave them a new commandment: to love one another (13:34).

Arrested that night, Jesus was bound and taken first to the house of Annas who, after fruitless questioning, sent him to his son-in-law Caiaphas, the high priest who, in turn, had Jesus escorted to the praetorium of Pilate himself (18:13, 24, 28). By now, it was early morning, a cock already having crowed. History tells us that  Jewish authorities refused to enter the building, however, "lest they should be defiled; but that they might eat the Passover" that evening (18:28), obliging Pilate, somewhat incongruously, to pass to and from his own palace as he questioned Jesus and then his accusers. Finally brought outside for judgment, Jesus was led away to be crucified. "It was the preparation of the Passover, and about the sixth hour" (noontime) (19:14, 16).

Please read this carefully; it is said that Jews did not want to enter the building so they would not be defiled so they can eat the Passover, but Jesus already had a Passover dinner did he not?

The answer is simple, Jesus had a Passover dinner on the evening of 14/15th but Passover day is all day 15th day as is first day of unleavened bread.

 John said, Jesus died on the Day of Preparation (Nisan 14th), the day before the Passover meal, sometime after noon but before sunset that evening. (Philo speaks of Passover "beginning at noonday and continuing till evening," The Special Laws, II.37.145). This does not correspond with factual events, John claims that Jesus died on the preparation day 14th of Nisan yet Jesus had a Passover dinner evening ending the 14th and beginning of the 15th, so it stands to reason that if Jesus had a Passover dinner (assuming when the right time was) which according to bible it was evening ending the 14th day.

Having had a Last Supper the night before, Jesus does not partake of the Passover meal but is sentenced and crucified while (in the Synoptics) it still was being prepared. When Luke, example, says it was about the sixth hour (noontime) that Jesus reassured the thief on the cross that he would be with him that day in paradise (23:44), in John, Jesus still was standing before Pilate, who declared to the Jews, "Behold your King!" (19:14).

Moreover history tells us the following, this Passover fell on a Saturday, thereby coinciding with the weekly Sabbath. "That sabbath day was an high day" (19:31), in which the two festivals were celebrated on the same day, and Friday was the Day of Preparation for them both. The death of Jesus on the Day of Preparation was at the same time that the lambs were being prepared for the Passover feast later that evening, at the beginning of Passover Day. Jesus himself has become the sacrificial lamb or, in the words of John the Baptist, "the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world" (1:29, 36), dying at the same time as the paschal lambs were being ritually slaughtered in the Temple—as prefigured by I Corinthians "For even Christ our passover is sacrificed for us" (5:7).Please lets look at inconsistencies, Jesus had a Passover diner which could be at the earliest after Dusk on the 14th which by default had to be Shabbat , that night which was beginning of the 15th day Jesus went to Gethsemane in the early hours of the morning of the 15th where he was arrested, example when Peter Denied Jesus 3 times before the rooster crows.

History-recorded events are certainly confusing to say the least not to mention in certain parts contradicting, either gospels did not synchronise their writings or there was foul play in writing them. I firmly believe that Jesus had a Passover dinner at an appropriate time as our God  is precise and on time, however, if Jesus had a Passover dinner evening of the 14th/15th this would mean that it was the ending evening of the Shabbat and the beginning of the first day of the Passover “DAY”.

According to Josephus, this would have been "from the ninth hour till the eleventh" (3 p.m. to 5 p.m.) (War of the Jews, VI.9.3). By the first century AD, the number of lambs ritually killed by priests at the Temple was so great that sacrifices had to begin earlier in the afternoon. (For Passover in AD 70, the last year that it stood, Josephus relates that 256,500 lambs were slaughtered at Jerusalem, as were the Jews themselves who had gone there to celebrate but then were trapped inside the besieged city by Titus and his Roman legionaries.)

And, "because it was the preparation, that the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day" (John 19:31; cf. Deuteronomy 21:23, "His body shall not remain all night upon the tree"), Jesus has to die before the beginning of the Sabbath, when capital punishment was prohibited by Jewish law. This is why John alone speaks of the legs of the two thieves being broken so that they not remain alive on the cross (cf. Cicero, Philippics, XIII.27, "it is quite impossible for him to die unless his legs are broken," a proverbial remark said of Titus Plancus, whose shifting political alliances allowed him to survive; for him, even though "They are broken, and still he lives"). Unable to lift themselves to breathe, suffocation would come all the more readily and death hastened—before the start of the Sabbath (and Passover) that evening, only hours later. The legs of Jesus no doubt would have been broken as well, had he not already died (as confirmed by the thrust of a spear in his side), thus fulfilling God's command that "neither shall ye break a bone thereof" of the paschal lamb (Exodus 12:46, John 19:33-34).

Jewish law also prohibited deliberations and rulings in a capital case being made at night. If there were a guilty verdict, it had to wait until the decision could be reaffirmed the following day—which precluded cases being adjudicated on the eve of a Sabbath or feast day (Mishnah Sanhedrin, IV.1). The Synoptic account of a meeting of the Sanhedrin being convened to consider such a case on the eve of Passover is therefore suspect. Too, the discrepancy between its intention not to arrest Jesus "on the feast day, lest there be an uproar of the people" (Mark 14:2) and his actual arrest on that day is intriguing—as is mention of Simon who, having "coming out of the country" (14:21), was compelled to carry the cross of Jesus. The presumption is that he had been working in the countryside and walked into town—both of which would have violated the injunction to "not do any work" on the Sabbath. In Acts 1:12, for example, the distance from the Mount of Olives to Jerusalem was "a sabbath day's journey." According to Josephus, this was five stadia or furlongs, about a thousand yards (Antiquities of the Jews, XX.8.6.), which is to say that it was short enough not to constitute "work." Josephus of Arimathea also was busy on Passover day, asking Pilate for the body of Jesus, buying a linen shroud, wrapping Jesus in it and laying him in the tomb (Mark 15:43, 46).Once again take notice, Josephus is asking Pilate for the body of Jesus on the Passover day which is 15th, so scripture is little all over the place , if Josepus asked Pilate for the body on the Passover day (which by the way i believe to be correct) then events depicting Friday , Saturday  and Sunday are false.I say this with confidence supported by historical facts such as, friday , saturday nor sunday as names of the days did not exist, Roman Republic calendar at the time had 8 day week so it is evident that Constantine and his 13 Cardinals had they insertion imposed on the Christianity.

For centuries the Romans used a period of eight days in civil practice, but in 321 CE Emperor Constantine established the seven-day week in the Roman calendar and designated Sunday as the first day of the week.

Week | Origin, History, & Facts - Britannica

 

Britannica

https://www.britannica.com › ... › Matter & Energy

For centuries the Romans used a period of eight days in civil practice, but in 321 CE Emperor Constantine established the seven-day week in the Roman calendar and designated Sunday as the first day of the week.

Week | Origin, History, & Facts - Britannica

 

Britannica

https://www.britannica.com › ... › Matter & Energy

So my dear friends, Roman empire had 8 day week till year 321 CE and that is when 7 day week was created by Rome at the same time, interesting no organisation and even those whose insignia is seventh day sets them apart (does it?) Not to forget in 321 CE not only did Romans go to 7day week they also name their days according to pagan gods .

Looking at this from an intellectual point of view one can not but laugh (if it was not sad), world of Christianity has been duped in to believing such important event as Jesus’s crucifixion and resurrection to be Pagan described event, moreover as you can see by Brittanica history it was not possible to describe events at Council of Nicaea reporting events that occurred 300 years latter. I must say that intellectually 13 cardinals were not the sharpest tools in the shed . They arrogance took better of them and they adjusted texts and events to suit their narratives not counting that 1700+ years later technology will prove them wrong.

Whilst i write this firmly believing to be actual i ask people that read it to correct me if i am wrong and if i am satisfied with new light with Gods help will be happy to change my view.

Let’s  continue

If Jesus died on Nisan 14th as Jews claim, the Day of Preparation, then in what years during the prefecture of Pontius Pilate in Judaea (AD 26–36) did that day fall on a Friday? Using astronomical data, Humphreys and Waddington have calculated that there are only two dates during this decade that a Friday Passover could be celebrated on Nissan 14: either April 7, AD 30 or April 3, AD 33. A Passover on Nisan 15 (as the Synoptic gospels contend) would be in the year AD 27 or AD 34, which almost certainly is too early or too late. According to my understanding of historical events, year of Jesus’s crucifixion was 31CE but i am open for adjustment if another view presented.

One fact they are all missing is, preparation day can not be 14th day as by default 7th day is Shabbat, so is 14th as God would not allow them to do work on Shabbat as we have seen during Exodus they could not even pick Mana on Shabbat. So the idea that Preparation day was 14th day can not possibly be correct as it defiles 4th commandment.

John records three Passovers during Jesus' ministry—the first at its beginning (2:13), when he was baptized by John the Baptist, who had begun his own ministry in AD 29 (Luke 3:1); 

a second midway through, while Jesus was ministering in Galilee (6:4); 

and the last just before Jesus' death, when he and his disciples went to Jerusalem, for the "passover was nigh at hand" (11:55). 

(John also mentions a fourth, unnamed "feast of the Jews"—but does not identify it as a Passover, 5:1.)

By then, the Temple had been forty-six years "in building" (2:20), work having begun by Herod's father, Herod the Great, "in the eighteenth year of his reign" (Antiquities of the Jews, XV.11.1). Josephus also says "in the fifteenth year of his reign" (The Jewish War, I.21.1), but the discrepancy is between when Herod was proclaimed king of Judaea by the Roman Senate in 40 BC (I.14.4) and when he actually secured the throne three years later, in 37 BC. Counting inclusively from that date, Herod began to rebuild the Temple complex in 20 BC.

But first, a thousand wagons were made ready to bring stone and ten thousand skilled workmen assembled. A thousand sacerdotal robes were purchased for the priests, some of whom were taught to be stone masons and carpenters. 

"Not till everything was well prepared for the work" could the foundation be laid and building begin (Antiquities of the Jews, XV.11.2-3). It is not known how long these preparations took before work on the most sacred inner part of the Temple began, but Josephus recounts that it was "built by the priests in a year and six months" (XV.11.6). 

Allowing perhaps two years altogether, the inner Temple would have been completed about 18 BC. Forty-six years later would be AD 29. For the ministry of Jesus to have begun about that time and extend over three annual Passovers, he could not have been crucified in AD 30 but not excluded.

Jesus was about "about thirty years of age" (Luke 3:23) when he was baptized by John and began to teach, which Matthew states to have been "in the days of Herod the king" (2:1). At the end of his life, when Herod was thought to be dead or dying, a golden eagle that he had erected over the gate to the Jewish Temple was torn down (Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews, XVII.6.2ff; The Jewish War, I.6.4). 

The sedition was suppressed and the instigators burned alive. "And that very night there was an eclipse of the moon" (Antiquities of the Jews, XVII.6.4). Herod died soon afterwards, sometime before "the approach" of Passover that year, a month later (XVII.9.3). This lunar eclipse (the only time such a phenomenon is mentioned by Josephus in all his voluminous writings) is thought to have occurred in 4 BC.

Jesus himself would have to be born sometime before the death of Herod. If in 5 BC (when a comet was visible over Bethlehem), he would have been about thirty-three years old when he began to teach—which accords with Luke, who may have mentioned "thirty years" because that is the age at which one first could "do the work in the tabernacle of the congregation" (Numbers 4:3, 23, 30). 

(John the Baptist also would have been about thirty years of age when he began to preach, having been conceived just six months before Jesus, Luke 1:24ff. So, too, does a man attained his greatest strength at that age, Mishna: Pirkei Avot, 5:25. Joseph, for example, was thirty years old when he began to rule over Egypt, Genesis 41:46—as were Saul and David when they became king.) So 30 years in Jewish males had a meaning of some sort.

Proponents of AD 30 as the year of Jesus' death calculate that he was born the year that Herod died, was thirty years of age when baptized, and taught for three years. Adding thirty-three years to 4 BC (and subtracting a year to allow for the fact there is no AD 0) yields the desired date. Moreover, such a chronology assumes that Tiberius had begun to rule in AD 12, when he was awarded imperium to "govern the provinces jointly with Augustus" (Suetonius, Life of Tiberius, XXI.1; Velleius Paterculus, The Roman History, II.121.1-2). 

By this reckoning, Jesus, who was baptized "in the fifteenth year of the reign of Tiberius Caesar" (Luke 3:1), would have begun his public ministry in AD 27, dying three years later.

There is no evidence, however, neither historical nor numismatical, that Tiberius ever did rule as co-regent; rather, he succeeded Augustus as emperor in AD 14 (Tacitus, Annals, I.5, Suetonius, Life of Tiberius, XXIV.2; Dio, Roman History, LVI.30.5). 

The baptism of Jesus fifteen years later would have been in AD 29—again, too late for him to have been crucified the following year.

History claims that  Jesus therefore died on Friday, April 3, AD 33 at about 3 p.m., a few hours before the beginning of Passover day and the Sabbath. This is the date in the Julian calendar, which had been introduced in 45 BC, this is partially true, Julian calendar was introduced 45BC but it is not stating the fact that it was 8 day week and days were marked with letters A-H. christianity  follows the convention that historical dates adhere to the calendar in use at the time which is a false assumption. If you consider 8 day week and that 7 day week with daily names was implemented 321CE then events as described are not true, instead, the current Gregorian calendar was retroactively extended to a date prior to its introduction in 1582 (or 1752, when it was adopted by the United States and United Kingdom), such a proleptic date would be different (i.e., a date retroactively calculated using a later calendar).

The equivalent Jewish date for the death of Jesus is Nisan 14, 3793 anno mundi, which is computed by adding 3761 BC (its proleptic Julian date) to AD 33 and subtracting a year. In the Jewish calendar, 3761 is the year of creation, as determined by the sage Halafta, who used only the chronology of the Bible as his authority, and codified by the twelfth-century scholar Maimonides a millennium later. But if we take into consideration that Jews would not make extra steps on Shabbat then is not logical nor biblical to claim that Jesus was crucified on the 14th day which was Shabbat.

To reconcile or adjust the Gospel accounts, it has been suggested that Jesus, no doubt aware of his imminent arrest, did not have a Passover meal (which would have required the Temple sacrifice of a paschal lamb in any event) but simply a last supper the night before. Or there was a scribal error in translating the third and sixth hour, confusing gamma and digamma—an argument put forward by Ammonius of Alexandria (Patrologiae Græcæ, LXXXV, Col. 1512) in the early third century AD and by Eusebius a century later (Greek Fragments, To Marinas, Suppl. 4).

Others (especially those concerned about Biblical inerrancy) have sought to harmonize the Gospels by suggesting that John and the Synoptics used different calendars. For example, Jesus may have followed the solar calendar of the Essenes, an apocalyptic sect that split from the priesthood at Jerusalem and settled at Qumran on the shores of the Dead Sea. Rejecting the traditional Jewish lunar calendar, they believed that "God appointed the sun to be a great sign on the earth for days and for sabbaths and for months and for feasts and for years and for sabbaths of years and for jubilees and for all seasons of the years (Book of Jubilees, II.9)—and those who "will not make the year three hundred and sixty-four days only, and for this reason they will go wrong as to the new moons and seasons and sabbaths and festivals" (VI.38).

Their own ecclesiastical calendar was divided into thirteen months, each of twenty-eight days, for a total of fifty-two weeks or 364 days. Such a year is divisible by seven, which meant that any given date always fell on the same day—and each week, month, and year began on Sunday and ended on the Sabbath (cf. I Enoch,LXXII). Even if this calendar was used it would mean that 13 mont each had 28 days with equal 7 day weeks.

 Coincidentally, Philo, too, speaks of the Passover, "And this universal sacrifice of the whole people is celebrated on the fourteenth day of the month, which consists of two periods of seven, in order that nothing which is accounted worthy of honour may be separated from the number seven. But this number is the beginning of brilliancy and dignity to everything" (The Special Laws, II.xxxvii.149).

They claim

"We can now say that John's account is historically precise. Jesus truly shed his blood on the eve of Easter a the time of the immolation of the lambs. In all likelihood, however, he celebrated the Passover with his disciples in accordance with the Qumran calendar, hence, at least one day earlier [Nisan 14]; he celebrated it without a lamb, like the Qumran community which did not recognize Herod's temple and was waiting for the new temple."

Humphreys, too, has proposed that different calendars were followed in his own attempt to reconcile John and the Synoptic Gospels. But he rejects the Qumran calendar of the Essenes—which, no matter how elegantly its 364 days are divisible by seven, does not seem to have intercalated for the 365.25 days of the solar calendar. Over time and certainly by that of Jesus, it would have become increasingly out of phase with the sun. And, even if intercalated, Passover was later in that calendar then in the traditional Jewish one. They will do anything to muddy the waters, they filed miserably during Council of Nicaea while compiling the bible as we know it today and now they are trying to tell us that Jesus used Qumran calendar how pathetic!

Whereas John used the traditional Jewish lunar calendar (an adoption of the Babylonian calendar during the Exile), which measured the day from sunset to sunset, Humphreys has proposed that Matthew, Mark, and Luke adhered to an earlier lunar calendar of the Egyptians at the time of the Exodus, in which the first day of the lunar month began, not with the appearance of the crescent moon but on the previous night, when the moon was new at lunar conjunction. In this pre-Exilic calendar, a day was counted from sunrise to sunrise, when the lunar crescent was last seen in the morning sky just before sunrise. This, too, would allow the Passover lamb to be sacrificed on the same day as the Passover meal was eaten—but on a Wednesday.But i keep repeating at that time Wednesday did not exist why insist on perverting the cause of history? In addition they could not have used Egyptian calendar during exodus because as that calendar had 10 day week 3 week month.

Different calendars also would explain the dating of the Feast of Unleavened Bread (so named because the Israelites did not have time to leaven their bread before departing Egypt), where in Exodus 12:18 and Ezekiel 45:21, it begins on Nisan 14; and in Leviticus 23:6 and Numbers 28:17, on Nisan 15. Mark's statement, for example, that "the first day of unleavened bread [is] when they killed the passover" is potentially confusing in that the feast occurred on Nisan 15th, whereas the sacrifice of the Passover lamb was celebrated the day before. But, here, he may have meant that the Passover was the first meal of the seven-day Feast; cf. Josephus "it being the fourteenth day of the month" (War of the Jews, V.3.1).Passover meal was evening ending the 14th which was Shabbat and beginning of 15th, God slaughtered firstborns at midnight on the 15th day, so there is very little room to manipulate the masses.

In fact, alternative calendars do not seem to have been used in first-century Palestine; nor is there a reason to assume that Jesus made his pilgrimage to Jerusalem at a time any different from other Jews traveling to the city to celebrate the Passover feast. To reconcile the two Gospel accounts also is to gloss over what each actually has said. In Mark, the Last Supper occurs at the same time that Jews were celebrating the Passover. 

The bread and wine (the body and blood of Jesus) have now replaced the traditional Jewish Passover. Too, Jesus died on the Day of Passover when the moon was full, as it was on the spring equinox (March 25) when the world itself had been created (Tertullian, Against the Jews, VIII.18; Hippolytus, Commentary on Daniel, IV.23.1; Clement of Alexandria, Stromata, I.21; Augustine, On the Trinity, IV.5; also the apocryphal Acts of Pilate, I.Prol.). 

In John, he died on the Day of Preparation as the sacrificial Lamb of God. There is no passover meal for, as Hippolytus later wrote, "He did not eat the passover of the law. For He was the passover that had been of old proclaimed" (Refutation of All Heresies, Fragment I).This is an incorrect version as it defies logic, how can John claim that Jesus died on preparation day when Jesus had a Passover meal on a Passover day evening of 14th/15th?\

——————————————————————

On Friday (which did not exist), April 3, AD 33, too, there was a partial lunar eclipse as the full sanguine moon rose above Jerusalem, thus fulfilling the prophecy quoted by Peter that "The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the moon into blood, before that great and notable day of the Lord come" (Acts 2:20). Although it is fitting that the blood smeared on the door frames of the Israelites in Egypt as "a token upon the houses where ye are" (Exodus 12:13) should prefigure a blood-red moon rising above Jerusalem that night, later calculations indicate that the eclipse would have been almost over by then—and the redness suggested by Humphreys and Waddington much less pronounced and as likely due to dust in the atmosphere.

But there was another incident, this one historical rather than astronomical, that supports the crucifixion of Jesus in AD 33: the death in Rome of the praetorian prefect Lucius Sejanus, commander of the imperial guard, two years before. Retiring to Capri in AD 26, Tiberius effectively abdicated his responsibilities to Sejanus, who appointed Pilate prefect of Judaea that year. Both men were virulently anti-Jewish: Sejanus "desirous to destroy our nation" (Philo, On the Embassy to Gaius, XXIV.160; Against Flaccus, I.1) and Pilate determined "to abolish the Jewish laws" (Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews, XVIII.3.1). 

Shortly after Sejanus' death in AD 31 (and no doubt to show his continuing loyalty to the emperor), Pilate dedicated some gilded shields in Herod's palace in Jerusalem—which provoked a riot (On the Embassy to Gaius, XXXVIII.299ff). Josephus later relates a similar (if not the same) story. 

Roman standards, adorned with the emperor's image, were brought secretly into Jerusalem during the night, prompting a riot among the populace, who considered "their laws to have been trampled under foot" (The Jewish War, II.9.2-3; retold in Antiquities of the Jews, XVIII.3.1). Money taken from the Temple treasury to begin construction of an aqueduct provoked further unrest, which was brutally suppressed (The Jewish War, II.9.4; also Antiquities of the Jews, XVIII.3.2).

Pilate was in a quandary, "neither venturing to take down what he had once set up, nor wishing to do any thing which could be acceptable to his subjects" (On the Embassy to Gaius, XXXVIII.303). 

When a supplicatory letter was sent to Tiberius, entreating that he intervene, Sejanus was dead, having been belatedly executed for treason in AD 31 (Dio, LVIII.11.1ff). With the loss of his patron, Pilate no doubt was fearful of his association with the disgraced Sejanus. 

Indeed, he was reproached by the emperor, who ordered the immediate removal of the offending objects, which were to be placed instead in the Temple of Augustus at Caesarea on the coast (On the Embassy to Gaius, XXXVIII.305).

This wariness in giving further offence may explain why Pilate, "a man of a very inflexible disposition, and very merciless as well as very obstinate," was so uncharacteristically acquiescent in handing Jesus over to the Jewish authorities. He was fearful that, if they were to send an embassy to Tiberius, it "might impeach him with respect to other particulars of his government, in respect of his corruption, and his acts of insolence, and his rapine, and his habit of insulting people, and his cruelty, and his continual murders of people untried and uncondemned, and his never ending, and gratuitous, and most grievous inhumanity" (XXXVIII.301–302). 

No doubt the Jews were aware of Pilate's vulnerability when they threatened that "If thou let this man go, thou art not Caesar's friend" (John 19:12). In AD 30, when Sejanus still was alive, such a threat would have been a matter of indifference; afterwards, it had to be taken into account.

In AD 36, there was yet another disturbance, when Pilate thwarted the Samaritan followers of someone claiming to be the prophet foretold in Deuteronomy 18:15ff. 

Although only the principals were executed, the Samaritans complained to the governor about the number slain, and Pilate was recalled "to answer before the emperor to the accusations of the Jews" (Antiquities of the Jews, XVIII.4.1ff). He hastened to Rome but, by the time he arrived, the ailing Tiberius had died, to be succeeded by Caligula. Nothing more is recorded of Pilate's fate.

For Christian apologists, this was a problem. In about AD 180, the pagan philosopher Celsus had asked why "no calamity happened even to him who condemned him" (quoted by Origen, Against Celsus, II.34). 

If Pilate killed the son of God, he chided, why had God not punished him? When we in reality begin to think about the role Pilate was entrusted with as part of the plan of salvation then it is clear that Pilate had one outcome which was part of God's plan. Many people are quick to judge Pilate for condemning Jesus to death, but question of significance is  was acquittal an option and did plan of salvation have “plan b “? Pilate has done everything that he could to avoid the judgment but Jews insisted, he even offered to free him as part of his discretion yet they chose the thief.

It was a question that discomfited the early church, especially during the first and second centuries AD, when the young sect already was viewed with suspicion by the Romans. 

In the reign of Claudius, for example, Jews had been expelled from Rome because there were constant "disturbances at the instigation of Chrestus" (Suetonius, Life of Claudius, XXV.4; cf. Acts 18:2). Under Nero, members of the "pernicious superstition" founded by Christus were persecuted for the great fire in Rome and that "class of men, loathed for their vices, whom the crowd styled Christians....convicted, not so much on the count of arson as for hatred of the human race" (Tacitus, Annals, XV.44). 

In a letter written to Trajan about AD 112, Pliny the Younger, governor of Bithynia in northern Asia Minor, complained of their "stubbornness and inflexible obstinacy" in adhering to a "depraved and excessive superstition" (Letters, X.96; cf. I Peter 2:12, written to the faithful in Bithynia, warning that people "speak against you as evil-doers,” also 3:16, 4:4).

The Gospels, therefore, prudently refrained from overtly criticizing the Roman prefect of Judaea for his culpability in the death of Jesus. In John, for example, Pilate is said to have twice declared that "I find in him no fault at all" (18:4, 38); in Matthew, "I am innocent of the blood of this just person" (27:24); in Mark, "Why, what evil hath he done? (15:14); in Luke, the declaration was "said unto them the third time" (23:22).As we can see Pilate stated many time that he finds no guilt on Jesus yet he ruled to please the Jews and more importantly to fulfil the Prophecy.

Written about AD 150, the pseudepigraphical Gospel of Peter is the earliest non-canonical passion narrative—although, like other writings falsely attributed to the apostles, it was rejected as apocryphal by the early church, "knowing that such were not handed down to us" (Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, VI.12.3, III.3.2, 25.6). 

This gospel is even more emphatic in exonerating Pilate, who is said to have declared "I am clear from the blood of the son of God" and kept news of the resurrection from the Jews (XI.46–47). Rather, it is Herod, the Jewish tetrarch of Galilee, who is responsible for the crucifixion, as are the Jews themselves. When Joseph of Arimathea (here, a friend of Pilate) asks to be allowed to bury the body of Jesus, Pilate is obliged to seek permission from Herod, who reassured him that, even if he had not been asked, "we should have buried him, since also the Sabbath dawneth; for it is written in the law that the sun should not set upon one that hath been slain" (II.5, cf. John 19:31, "the bodies should not remain upon the cross on the sabbath day"). As to the Jews, they are utterly malevolent. When the thief on the cross recognized that Jesus has become the savior of men, "they were wroth with him, and commanded that his legs should not be broken, that so he might die in torment" (IV.13–14; cf. Luke 23:41). The referent in Greek is not clear, however, and Jesus himself may be meant. Whether Jesus or those who believed in him, it is the Jews, not the Romans, who are hostile to the new religion.

————————————————————-

Among the annual sacred feasts enumerated in Leviticus, there was, after Passover and the Feast of Unleavened Bread, a Feast of First-Fruits (Nisan 16), which was to be celebrated the day after the Jewish Sabbath, when the first sheaf of barley was offered to God in thanksgiving (Leviticus 23:10–11;"before the first day of unleavened bread, their feast" .

As the Passover was celebrated on the first full moon following the vernal equinox, so too did the church determine that Easter would be on the first Sunday following the first full moon on or after the vernal equinox (March 21). In most years, when the lunar Jewish calendar does not need to adjust for a leap year, Easter occurs on the Sunday after Passover. But there was a problem, as Eusebius records in his Ecclesiastical History (V.23-25),

"A question of no small importance arose at that time. For the parishes of all Asia, as from an older tradition, held that the fourteenth day of the moon, on which day the Jews were commanded to sacrifice the lamb, should be observed as the feast of the Saviour’s passover. It was therefore necessary to end their fast on that day, whatever day of the week it should happen to be. But it was not the custom of the churches in the rest of the world to end it at this time, as they observed the practice which, from apostolic tradition, has prevailed to the present time, of terminating the fast on no other day than on that of the resurrection of our Saviour" (V.23.1). Strange , they claim that Jesus resurrected on Sunday which was supposedly first day of the week but at the time of Jesus’s death Sunday was not in existence and that day would have been day G or seven day of 8 day Roman week.

This was the Quartodeciman controversy (from quarta decima, "fourteenth") over whether Easter should coincide with the Passover on Nisan 14 (as observed by the early church in Jerusalem and Asia Minor, which claimed their authority from the apostle John) or be celebrated only on Easter Sunday (as insisted by churches at Roman, which did not want an alignment with the Jewish calendar). It was a potential schism that was effectively settled only by a promulgation from the First Council of Nicaea in AD 325.

In a Germanic language such as English, the festival of Easter (Ostern in German) derives from Eostre, a pagan goddess of the dawn and spring. 

The Old English word first is mentioned by the English monk Bede in De temporum ratione ("The Reckoning of Time"), written in AD 725, where he identified the month of April as Eosturmonath (§330).

"Eosturmonath has a name which is now translated 'Paschal month', and which was once called after a goddess of theirs named Eostre, in whose honour feasts were celebrated in that month. Now they designate that Paschal season by her name, calling the joys of the new rite by the time-honoured name of the old observance" (§331).

In the Life of Charlemagne, written about a century later, the Frankish scholar Einhard relates that, among the reforms of Charles the Great, "He gave the months names in his own tongue, in place of the Latin and barbarous names by which they were formerly known among the Franks" (§29). 

April was called Ostaramonath, "Easter month," Ostara and Eostre being related to Eos, the Greek goddess of dawn, heralding the arrival of spring. Jacob Grimm (the elder of the Brothers Grimm) elaborates on the etymology in Teutonic Mythology, first published in 1835.

"This Ostara, like the AS. [Anglo-Saxon] Eastre, must in the heathen religion have denoted a higher being, whose worship was so firmly rooted, that the christian teachers tolerated the name, and applied it to one of their own grandest anniversaries....Ostara, Eastre seems therefore to have been the divinity of the radiant dawn, of upspringing light, a spectacle that brings joy and blessing, whose meaning could be easily adapted to the resurrection-day of the christian's God" (pp. 292-292).

Passover is Pascha in Greek, as transliterated from the Aramaic. This also is the word for Easter in Latin and the Romance languages.

The seventeenth-century ivory crucifix is in the Treasury of the Cathedral of Córdoba (Spain), which is situated there within the Great Mosque (Mezquita).

Conclusion

It is evident that events surrounding Jesus’s death are of some concern yet in my opinion even if we did not know the date of his death or resurrection it would not impact our ability or eligibility to be saved. 

This on the other hand puts shadow over the credibility of 13 Cardinals and Constantine as Pontifus Maximus especially Council of Nicaea. God has said that light will have nothing to do with darkness meaning the truth will not mix with lies. As a young Adventist i was listening to stories how God would not allow Satan to do certain things which would include changing Gods calendar , yet we can clearly see and it is confirmed by Jewish history that biblical calendar and its sabbath was surrendered to Romans 358 CE where Lords 7th day was substituted by Roman imposed 7th day which are not the same days.

Writings of gospel are seriously in question as they are to say the least contradictory at time and wrong at other times.

If Jesus had a Passover meal evening of 14th/15th then he was arrested in the early hours of 15th day and would have been crucified on the day of unleavened bread or 15th day of Nisan.

So to satisfy yourself please log in to 

https://www.timeanddate.com/calendar/jewish-calendar.html

and go to calendars, then click on monthly calendars, then chose location of Jerusalem and there you will have option to chose year from 0001 this Era to today , then search for Nisan 1 and hence Nisan 14th so you will see which day that date corresponds with Roman calendar days, only then you will be 100% sure that it was all twisted and creates deception ever perpetuated.

In closing dear friends , please don't rely on my research pray and search for you self and god will show us the way, unless we discover the truth our selfs helped by Holy Spirit no other party will do it for us, specially not our churches which are driven by one blessing called DOLLAR.

May God help us all , and as a reminder if someone has clearer picture then this please share as i would love to be wrong.

Kindest regards

Jack M Samardzija

Brisbane December 2 2023