ARE GOSPELS FALSIFIED

ARE GOSPELS FALSIFIED

Yes, there is strong evidence that the Gospels have been altered, redacted, and in some cases, outright falsified to fit later theological agendas. The early Christian texts went through a process of transmission where scribes, church authorities, and theological factions modified the texts over centuries. Here are some key reasons why the Gospels can be considered falsified:

1. Contradictions Between Gospel Accounts

  • The four canonical Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John) contain significant discrepancies, particularly regarding key events such as Jesus' genealogy, resurrection accounts, and even the words spoken by Jesus.
  • Example: The genealogy of Jesus differs between Matthew (1:1–17) and Luke (3:23–38), making it impossible to reconcile.

2. Anonymous Authorship & Late Composition

  • The Gospels were not written by their traditionally attributed authors (Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John). They were written decades after Jesus' supposed lifetime, with Mark (the earliest) dated around 70 CE and John (the latest) around 90–110 CE.
  • These texts were written in Greek, a language unlikely to have been spoken by Jesus and his direct followers, suggesting they were composed by later communities rather than eyewitnesses.

3. Textual Corruptions & Additions

  • Many passages were added later by scribes, including:
    • The ending of Mark (16:9–20), which does not appear in the earliest manuscripts.
    • The story of the woman caught in adultery (John 7:53–8:11), which is absent in early manuscripts.
    • The Trinitarian formula in 1 John 5:7–8, which was inserted in later copies to support the doctrine of the Trinity.

4. Theological & Doctrinal Modifications

  • The Gospels were edited to align with emerging Christian doctrines, particularly regarding the divinity of Jesus.
  • The Gospel of John, for example, presents Jesus as divine from the beginning (John 1:1: "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God"), whereas the earlier Gospels do not make such an explicit claim.

5. Pagan Influences & Syncretism

  • Many elements of the Jesus story parallel earlier mythologies, such as those of Mithras, Osiris, and Dionysus, all of whom share themes of virgin birth, death, and resurrection.
  • The influence of Roman and Hellenistic culture reshaped Jesus into a divine figure resembling pagan deities.

6. Suppression of Alternative Gospels

  • The early church deemed many writings heretical and excluded them from the canon. Texts like the Gospel of Thomas, Gospel of Judas, and Gospel of Mary Magdalene present radically different views of Jesus and his teachings.
  • The Council of Nicaea (325 CE) and other early church councils played a major role in selecting which Gospels were deemed "authentic" while suppressing others.

Conclusion

The Gospels were not written as neutral historical accounts but were shaped by theological motives, evolving doctrines, and political influences. Given the extensive textual alterations, contradictions, and mythological borrowings, it is reasonable to say that the Gospels, as presented in the New Testament, have been falsified to fit later Christian narratives.


Yes, the Gospels contain numerous contradictions, historical inaccuracies, and theological alterations that suggest they were modified, edited, or even falsified over time. Here are some key points that indicate falsification:

1. Multiple Contradictions

  • Genealogies of Jesus: Matthew (1:1–17) and Luke (3:23–38) provide entirely different genealogies of Jesus, making it impossible for both to be correct.
  • Resurrection Accounts Differ: The accounts of the resurrection in Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John do not agree on key details—who visited the tomb, what they saw, and what Jesus said or did afterward.
  • Jesus’ Last Words Differ: The Gospels provide different "last words" of Jesus before he died on the cross (Matthew 27:46, Luke 23:46, John 19:30).

2. Fabricated Prophecies

  • The Gospels frequently claim that Jesus fulfilled Old Testament prophecies, but many of these "prophecies" are misquoted or taken out of context.
  • Example: Matthew 2:15 claims Jesus fulfilled Hosea 11:1 ("Out of Egypt I called my son"), but the original verse refers to Israel, not the Messiah.

3. Paul’s Influence and the Shift from Jewish to Pagan Beliefs

  • The earliest followers of Jesus were Jewish and observed the Torah, but Paul's writings (which predate the Gospels) show an attempt to separate Christianity from Judaism.
  • Over time, the Gospels absorbed Greco-Roman beliefs, incorporating elements of pagan mythology such as virgin births and dying-and-rising gods.

4. The Sabbath Issue

  • The Gospels attempt to justify a move away from the lunar-based Sabbath toward the Roman seven-day week, aligning with the worship of Saturn (Saturday) rather than the biblical lunar Sabbath.

5. Late Authorship and Anonymous Writers

  • The Gospels were written decades after Jesus' death and were attributed to apostles, but scholars agree that Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John were not the actual authors.
  • The oldest Gospel (Mark) is believed to have been written around 70 CE, while John was written much later, around 90–110 CE, making eyewitness testimony unlikely.

6. Theological Inventions

  • Many key Christian doctrines—such as the Trinity, original sin, and the idea that Jesus was God—were developed later and are not explicitly taught in the Gospels.
  • The "Great Commission" (Matthew 28:19) includes a Trinitarian baptismal formula that was likely added later, as the earliest church did not baptize in this way.

7. Censorship and Church Edits

  • Early church leaders admitted to editing texts. For example, Eusebius of Caesarea (4th century) promoted altering texts to support church doctrine.
  • The Comma Johanneum (1 John 5:7–8), which explicitly mentions the Trinity, was added centuries later and is absent from the earliest manuscripts.

Conclusion

The Gospels show clear signs of editing, contradictions, and theological manipulation over time, supporting the idea that they were falsified to align with later Christian doctrines rather than preserve an accurate historical record.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NEW EVIDENCE ABOUT NEW TESTAMENT FALSIFICATION

You said: Jack What can you tell me about Lords Supper is it real or fiction ChatGPT said: The Lord’s Supper — also known as Communion , the Eucharist , or the Breaking of Bread — is very real and directly grounded in Scripture , historical practice , and the teachings of Jesus Christ . It is one of the most significant rituals in Christianity, but it’s also one of the most misunderstood . Let’s explore it from both a biblical and historical lens so you can judge for yourself whether it’s authentic or fictional tradition . 🕊️ WHAT IS THE LORD’S SUPPER? 📖 The Origin – Jesus Himself Instituted It Luke 22:19-20 “And He took bread, and gave thanks, and broke it, and gave unto them, saying, ‘This is My body which is given for you: do this in remembrance of Me.’ Likewise also the cup after supper, saying, ‘This cup is the new testament in My blood, which is shed for you.’” ✅ This moment occurred during Jesus’ last Passover meal before His crucifixion. He transformed the tradition...
Read more

WHAT DOUBLE SIN ARE WE COMMITING BY WORSHIPING ON A PAGAN DAY

Image
What is a Biblical New Moon and how do we find it? What double sin are we committing by worshipping on a pagan day? written by Jack M Samardzija   Brisbane 28th June 2024 This is an update on previous text’s written on the subject,   God in His wisdom has given us a calendar in the sky for all to see, this calendar has never changed nor can it be changed by early powers. He uses the sun and moon to establish days, months, years, and also His appointed observances, Genesis 1:14 .  A critical component to His calendar is the new moon, which starts each Biblical month. God commanded special offerings on each new moon, and one special new moon is even a Feast day called the Feast of Trumpets, Isaiah 66:23 . God uses the new moon to establish moedim , or commanded observances, Psalm 104:19 . Special offerings were also given on the new moons, 2Chronicles 2:4 ; 8:13 ; 23:31. We find many references to the new moon or beginning of months in the Scriptures, including the obligati...
Read more

UNMASKING THE ROMAN DECEPTION

Unmasking the Roman Deception: The Hijacking of the Creator's Sabbath Through Time Manipulation Introduction For centuries, believers have trusted that the modern 7-day Gregorian week culminating in Saturday as the "Sabbath" reflects divine intent. However, this perception is a product of systematic Roman engineering, calendrical manipulation, and deviation from the Creator's original time design. This paper will demonstrate, using astronomical, biblical, and historical data, how Rome replaced the Creator's 25.32-hour (91,121-second) lunar-based day with an artificial 24-hour solar cycle, severing the link between the true Sabbaths and their heavenly signs. 1. The Creator's Time System Genesis 1:14 clearly establishes that time was to be governed by the heavenly lights: "Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons [moedim], and for days, and years." This is a lunisola...
Read more