THE GREAT ERASE AND REPLACE
IMMANUEL vs. JES-US CHRIST-US
A Forensic Audit of the Messiah's Identity (740 BCE – Present)
Dragi moji (My Dear Ones),
I am concerned. I don’t know how far this will all go, but where the evidence leads, we must follow. I must admit, this is wearing me down, but I feel it is my duty to complete the task, even if it kills me. I must say to those who are light in faith: please do not be discouraged. Be alert. Read and research for yourself. This is not easy, and it is even less comfortable to learn that most of what we inherited was falsified or forged. But considering who created history, we could hardly do worse.
Many of my readers will question my motives and my negative approach to the claims made in this book. You have every right to do so. However, your skepticism will not change the result if you truly wish to uncover the truth. If you want the status quo, then do nothing and consider my writings those of a dissident.
You might ask, "What is he about this time?". The matter is more serious than anything we have covered thus far. This document breaks down the "Identity Alteration" case into its specific mechanical and historical components. It explains how the theft occurred, why it was necessary for the conspirators, and where the evidence still lingers in the text. We will walk through the timeline of the crime, from the Divine Prophecy of Isaiah to the burning of the evidence in 303 CE, and finally to the rebranding in the 4th Century.
PART I: THE PROPHECY FROM GOD (THE ORIGINAL INSTRUCTION)
Timeline: Circa 740 BCE
To understand the crime and deception, we must first understand the Divine Instruction that was broken. In any legal or spiritual context, the "First Word" is the binding one in this case, the Prophecy from God. When God makes a covenant or issues a prophecy, it functions like a Supreme Command; it cannot be overturned by human parents, later scribes, or Roman Emperors . But whilst it should not, it did happen on a subject of deadly importance.
The prophecy of Isaiah 7:14 clearly states as follows:
"Therefore the Lord Himself will give you a sign: Behold, the young woman [ha-almah] shall conceive and bear a Son, and shall call His name Immanuel."
Note, she was to have a son and she was to call him Immanuel. Not Joseph, but Her. History created after 303 CE would like us to believe that Joseph had a dream and that an angel told him to call Him Jesus. This contradiction is a pure artificial design of history to suit the Roman narrativ.
Please note: SHALL CALL HIM IMMANUEL. This was not a suggestion; it was a direct order from God. This prophecy was given to the Prophet Isaiah by God, and the name Immanuel was God’s choice. It is interesting to note that Matthew in Verse 23 puts emphasis on the meaning of the name Immanuel ("God with us") and the meaning of the name Jes-us Christ-us ("Salvation"), which is completely contrary to God's design and His Word.
The Naming Decree (Ve-karat Shemo) In Hebrew scripture, God rarely names a baby before birth. When He does (Isaac, Solomon, John), the name is not a suggestion; it is a definition of reality.
Isaac: Means "Laughter" (defining his destiny).
Immanuel: Means "God With Us".
By commanding this name, God was defining the Nature of the Messiah. He was certifying that this child would not just be a representative of God, but the Presence of God.
It stands to reason that the baby's parents, Mary and Joseph, took notice of the instructions given by God specifically regarding the name. They were righteous people; they would not have disobeyed a direct Prophecy from God. After all, God in His foreknowledge knew who was going to play which role. If we were to adopt the official version as described by Matthew 1:21-24, then God’s choice of parents for Immanuel was not so good, as Joseph would change the name before the child was born (as this dream was meant to have happened in 4 BCE). If you can believe that our God can misjudge the character of both parents of His Son, then you can believe in history as served to us today.
The Stability of the Document Skeptics often claim, "Maybe the text changed over time." Skeptics are right. The Proof: The discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls specifically the Great Isaiah Scroll (1QIsa) shattered this doubt. This scroll, written hundreds of years before the birth of the Messiah, contains the exact Hebrew command: Immanuel.
Whilst the New Testament creators don’t deny Isaiah’s prophecy, they claim that Joseph got a dream that overrides the Word of God. Nothing and nobody has the power to override God’s instructions, and God does not change His prophecy without explanation. The requirement for the name was absolute.
PART II: THE BREACH (THE TEXTUAL SCAR)
Timeline: 1st Century CE (The Greek Gospels)
We now move to the "Crime Scene” the text of the New Testament itself. History would like us to believe that these righteous parents disobeyed God's order and named the baby Jesus. This is one of the greatest deceptions thus far. The baby was born, and according to God’s instructions, the baby was named Immanuel. He grew up as Immanuel, was crucified as Immanuel, and resurrected as Immanuel.
Where did Jes-us Christ-us come from, you might ask? We are looking for a “scar"a place where the text fights with itself. We find it in the first chapter of Matthew. In my view, while evidence is overwhelming that Romans created the New Testament, even they made mistakes which no doubt God made possible so we could find the truth.
Below you will see Chapter 1, Verse 21, which was the fabrication. This time it was an Angel saying to name him Jesus, but Verse 23 says his name was to be Immanuel.
The Overwrite (Verse 21): The text says: "She will bring forth a Son, and you shall call His name JESUS [Yeshua]...". Here, the "Angel" allegedly gives a command that violates the Isaiah Prophecy. He orders a common, functional name ("Salvation") instead of the specific Divine name ("God With Us"). Who had an interest to deny that God was among us?.
The Residue (Verse 23): Immediately after ordering the name "Jesus," the writer quotes the Prophecy to prove he is following the rules: "So all this was done that it might be fulfilled... 'and they shall call his name IMMANUEL'". The writer, whoever he might have been, was putting emphasis on "Salvation" instead of "God with us". In reality, this puts the whole New Testament on trial.
Forensic Exhibit A: The Grammatical Fingerprint There is an even deeper layer to this deception. When the author quoted Isaiah in Verse 23, he altered the grammar to hide his crime.
The Original (Isaiah): The Hebrew uses the verb v'karat (Feminine Singular). It means "SHE shall call". God gave the naming authority specifically to the Mother .
The Forgery (Matthew): The Greek text changes the verb to kalesousin (Plural). It means "THEY shall call" .
The Motive: The author knew the mother (Mary) must have acted as instructed by God and named him Immanuel. To cover this up, he changed "She" to "They," turning a specific legal name into a vague nickname that "people" might use. This is the fingerprint of tampering and forgery.
The Forensic Logic: Imagine a builder who is hired to build a Tower. He builds a Bridge instead. Then, to prove he did a good job, he points to the blueprints for the Tower. The text points to the Blueprint (Immanuel) to validate the Construction of (Jesus).
The Flaw: They do not match.
The Conclusion: The original narrative likely described the birth of Immanuel. A later editor, needing to force the "Jesus" tradition into the text, changed the name in Verse 21 but was afraid to delete the Holy Prophecy in Verse 23. He left the contradiction visible, creating a permanent "scar" in the record. I thank him for that, as without it we would be totally in the dark.
PART III: THE IMPOSSIBLE DREAM (THE CHAIN OF CUSTODY)
Timeline: 4 BCE – 80 CE
Before we discuss the burning of the books, we must investigate the credibility of the "Angel Story" itself. How did the author of Matthew know that Joseph had a dream as claimed?.
The Broken Chain of Custody For this story to be history, the information had to travel from Joseph’s mind (c. 4 BCE) to Matthew’s scroll (c. 80 CE). That is a gap of 84 years. Joseph disappears from the record before Jesus begins his ministry. Joseph likely died decades before Matthew wrote a single word. There is no witness to a private dream. Unless Joseph wrote it down or told Jesus, the information died with him.
The Evidence of Silence Did Joseph tell Jesus? If this dream was the "Divine Warrant" for his name, Jesus would have taught it. Yet, in over 1,900 verses of recorded teachings, Jesus never mentions this dream. He quotes Isaiah constantly, but he never quotes the angel who supposedly named him. His silence proves he did not know this story.
The Myth of the Memoir (The Literacy Barrier) Apologists claim Joseph wrote a memoir. This is historically impossible.
The Economics: In Luke 2:24, Joseph offers "two turtledoves” the specific offering for the destitute poor who could not afford a lamb.
The Education: Literacy in 1st Century Palestine was roughly 3%, restricted to the wealthy elite. A manual labourer (tekton) from Nazareth would not possess the expensive papyrus or the scribal training to write a theological memoir.
Forensic Summary: Joseph had the alleged dream in year 4 BCE, some 34 years before Jesus started his ministry. Jesus got to know Matthew during his ministry, by which time Joseph had died. So where did Matthew get the information from regarding the dream one carpenter had?. There is no evidence at all to suggest that Matthew and Joseph knew each other.
Verdict: The "Dream of Joseph" is not history. It is a Retroactive Fabrication a literary device invented 80 years later to explain why the Messiah bore the name "Jesus" despite the binding command of Isaiah to call Him "Immanuel".
PART IV: THE FORENSIC BOTTLENECK (THE BURNING OF THE BOOKS)
Timeline: 303 CE
This section explains how the physical evidence was destroyed. This puts a finger on the wound, does it not?.
The Missing Witness (Papias) We have testimony from an early historian, Papias, who claimed that Matthew wrote his Gospel in Hebrew. That would make sense to me as he was a Jew. Why then is it widely claimed that all Gospels were written in Greek?. I must remind my readers that Papias was a Bishop of then Roman church so anything that he might have written could be fruit of the poisoned tree.
The Reality: The original gospels might have been written in Hebrew. But Diocletian burned all the material. After that, they could not write in Hebrew as they would have to declare their hand, so they chose the next best option and wrote in Greek as all the Apostles were dead by that time.
The Deduction: If the Hebrew original existed, it would have used the Hebrew name Immanuel. The fact that this document has "vanished" suggests it was inconvenient for the Greek/Roman church, so it was suppressed.
The Empire Burn Order (Diocletian)
How did they manage the switch? Easy, because in 303 CE, Emperor Diocletian ordered all Christian books burned. This event acted as a "filter" for what was to come. The Decree: Diocletian viewed the Christian refusal to sacrifice to the Roman gods as a threat to the Pax Deorum (Peace of the Gods). He ordered a systematic destruction of their libraries. Roman soldiers went town by town, seizing literary assets. Their goal was total erasure. They accomplished their task well. After that, Rome had a clean slate to create history as they saw fit, and they did. So replacing Immanuel with Jes-us Christ-us was an easy task, as the new generation knew only what they had been told.
The "Traditors" and the Donatist War The destruction of the texts was not just an external attack; it was an internal betrayal. A specific class of people emerged called Traditors (from the Latin tradere, meaning "to hand over"). These were Christian bishops, deacons, and leaders who, to save their own lives, walked out of the churches carrying the sacred scrolls the original genealogies, the Hebrew accounts and handed them over to the Roman authorities to be burned in the public square .
This betrayal caused a massive civil war known as the Donatist Schism. The Donatists argued that men who had burned the Word of God to save their skin had lost their spiritual authority. (Wow, good thing they don’t have the same rule today, as if they did, churches would have no pastors) .
The Forensic Relevance: The "Catholic" (Universal) church that emerged under Constantine was led largely by the faction that had compromised. The men who wrote the new history were the successors of the men who had burned the old history. The "Traditors" won the war, and the victors wrote the canonised Bible we have today.
Who Traditor’s were and what does that name mean
The crisis began at the start of the fourth century, when the Roman Empire decided to extinguish Christianity by law. In the year 303, under the rule of Diocletian, imperial edicts ordered churches destroyed, Scriptures confiscated, and clergy compelled to comply or face imprisonment, torture, or death. This was not a theoretical test of faith. Roman officials arrived at churches with soldiers and demanded books. Compliance was recorded. Resistance was punished. Traditores where what we might call traitors from within, they freely complied with the Empire by surrendering all original and copies of scrolls that were written for centuries. Whilst in every church and denomination there are those whose primary objective is good living conditions and prominence and those characteristics have not changed for millenniums.
When Constantine merged Paganism with Christianity he rewarded those that collaborated well during scriptural prohibition and prosecution, below is a list of those Church leaders that complied by the order of the Empire for which they were rewarded by becoming high level bishops and significant leaders of new found christianity.
Some Christians refused and died. Others resisted and survived. But a significant number of bishops chose another path: they handed over Scriptures, identified church property, or cooperated just enough to avoid consequences. These men were immediately known by a single word traditores, those who handed over the sacred documents , sort of Roman collaborators.
In North Africa, one of the most influential figures during this period was Mensurius of Carthage, the bishop of Carthage. When Roman officials demanded Scriptures, Mensurius did not encourage resistance. Instead, he hid some texts, handed over substitutes, and instructed his clergy to avoid martyrdom. More importantly, he protected priests and deacons who complied with Roman orders. Under his leadership, survival replaced witness as policy. This was the first step. Mensurius did not define doctrine, but he reshaped leadership culture. He taught that remaining in office mattered more than remaining unbroken.
When Mensurius died around 311, his protégé Caecilian of Carthage was elevated as bishop. Caecilian’s consecration immediately ignited a firestorm, because the man who ordained him was Felix of Aptunga, a bishop accused of surrendering Scriptures during the persecution. For many Christians in North Africa, this was unacceptable. Their reasoning was straightforward: a man who betrayed the faith could not transmit spiritual authority, and anyone ordained by him inherited that corruption.
Instead of submitting to spiritual judgment, Caecilian appealed to a new power that had just entered Christian history the Roman emperor. Constantine the Great, newly favourable to Christianity, was asked to decide what had previously been a matter of conscience and faithfulness. Constantine ruled in Caecilian’s favour. Felix of Aptunga was tried not by fellow believers but by a Roman court and declared legally innocent. With that ruling, a decisive line was crossed. Moral failure no longer disqualified a bishop. Legal acquittal replaced faithfulness. Office was preserved.
This moment did not just settle a local dispute. It rewrote the rules of authority for the entire church. Those who rejected Caecilian and Felix the movement later called Donatist were no longer treated as morally serious Christians but as enemies of unity. Imperial power was now used to suppress them. Churches were seized. Clergy were exiled. Communities that had preserved a strict ethic of faithfulness under persecution were silenced.
At the same time in Rome, the bishop Marcellinus was accused by ancient sources of having offered incense to pagan gods or surrendered sacred objects during the persecution. Whether every detail is true is less important than what followed. His alleged apostasy did not end the Roman episcopal line. His memory was rehabilitated, his office preserved, and continuity was protected. Rome made its position clear: the institution would survive even if its leaders failed.
Once persecution ended and Christianity became favoured rather than hunted, the church faced a new problem. It was now legal, wealthy, expanding rapidly, and internally divided. Different communities used different texts. Some writings supported strict moral accountability; others supported centralized authority and obedience. The bishops who now held power men whose authority depended on imperial recognition needed certainty. Open debate was dangerous. A closed list was safer.
In Egypt, one of the most powerful bishops of the fourth century, Athanasius of Alexandria, issued a letter in 367 that did something unprecedented. He named, for the first time in history, the exact twenty-seven books that now make up the New Testament. He did not present this list as a proposal. He declared it as fact. Other writings, some long used by Christian communities, were suddenly labeled unauthorized and dangerous. Athanasius did not derive this authority from consensus across all churches. He exercised it as a bishop operating inside an imperial system that had already decided who counted and who did not.
A generation later, the theological framework that justified all of this was provided by Augustine of Hippo, one of the most influential thinkers in Christian history. Augustine argued that the validity of sacraments and Scripture did not depend on the moral character of the clergy but on the authority of the Church as an institution. This argument was not abstract. It directly neutralized the central accusation against traditors. Betrayal no longer mattered. Office mattered. Unity mattered. Authority flowed downward, not upward.
Augustine supported councils in North Africa Hippo in 393 and Carthage in 397 and 419 that ratified the same canon Athanasius had listed. These councils were composed exclusively of imperial-approved bishops. Communities that had rejected traditors were excluded entirely. The canon was finalized without them, against them, and in opposition to their moral objections.
By the end of the fourth century, the transformation was complete. The men who had once surrendered Scriptures, or been protected by those who did, now presided over the decision of which writings would be called Scripture forever. The faith of martyrs did not decide the canon. Survival within empire did. Betrayal was not remembered as betrayal; it was buried beneath doctrines of unity and authority.
This is not speculation. It is the sequence of events. First came persecution. Then collaboration. Then reinstatement. Then imperial backing. Then doctrinal adjustment. Then canon closure. At no point was the moral failure of leadership allowed to interrupt the continuity of power. Instead, theology was reshaped to ensure it never could.
The New Testament canon, as it now exists, emerged from that world not the world of underground believers hiding texts from soldiers, but the world of bishops negotiating with emperors, courts, and councils. Once that is understood, the canon no longer appears as a purely spiritual inheritance. It appears as what history shows it to be: a collection finalized by men whose authority had already been secured by compromise. And that is the story most people are never told.
PART V: THE REBRANDING (THE INVENTION OF "JES-US CHRIST-US")
Timeline: 312 CE – 325 CE
Once the evidence was burned, the "Rebranding" began. Why was the name changed to “Jes-us Christ-us”?. The audit reveals that the name was engineered to fit the Greco-Roman Pantheon.
The Shift from “EL” (Immanu-el) to “US” (Jes-us)
Hebrew Class: Names end in -el (Immanu-el, Gabri-el) or -yah (Isai-ah). This marks the bearer as belonging to the Holy God of Israel.
Roman Class: Names end in -us (Latin) or -os (Greek). This marks the bearer as a masculine power figure of the Pagan world.
The Forensic Lineup (Categorization)
By adopting the -us suffix, the name "Jes-us Christ-us" was linguistically filed into the same category as the Roman gods:
- Ze-us (King of Gods)
- Cron-us (Titan)
- Uran-us (Sky God)
- Dionys-us (God of Rebirth)
- Jes-us (The Roman Saviour) .
The Solar Theology of Constantine Emperor Constantine was not a Christian; he was the High Priest (Pontifex Maximus) of the Cult of Sol Invictus (The Unconquered Sun). He took the attributes of the Sun God and pasted them onto the new figure of "Jes-us Christ-us”. - The Holy Day: The Day of the Sun (Dies Solis) became the Christian Sabbath (Sunday), replacing the biblical Saturday Sabbath.
The Birthday: The birthday of Sol was December 25th (Natalis Solis Invicti). This date was assigned to "Jes-us," even though shepherds do not watch their flocks in the fields in the dead of winter .
The New Logo: The Cross (312 CE) Alongside the new name, they needed a new symbol. At the Battle of the Milvian Bridge, Constantine claimed to see a vision. He did not see a wooden stake; he saw the Chi-Rho (☧), a symbol associated with the Sun God. The Cross was borrowed from Solar Paganism: - The Tau (T): Symbol of Tammuz.
The Ankh: Symbol of Egyptian Sun Gods.
The Sun Wheel: The Celtic Cross (a cross within a circle) is a literal diagram of the sun. By adopting the Cross, Rome created a military standard that replaced the reality of the Atonement with a symbol of conquest.
PART VI: THE BIOLOGICAL NECESSITY (THE VIRGIN BIRTH)
Timeline: Eternity
Even though they changed the name, they could not delete the Virgin Birth. This explains why the forgers kept the miracle but hid the identity.
The Paternity Logic: If you claim the King is God Incarnate, He cannot have a biological human father. The Virgin Birth is the only way to get God into a human body without infecting Him with Adam's sin or human lineage.
The Legal Loophole (Jeconiah's Curse): There was a curse on the royal bloodline of Jeconiah (Jeremiah 22:30) that said no descendant of his would sit on the throne. Joseph was from this cursed line. Because of the Virgin Birth, Jesus was Joseph's legal son (by adoption/marriage) but not his blood son. This allowed Him to claim the Throne (via Joseph) without inheriting the Curse (via blood).
The Proof of Tampering: The fact that the New Testament keeps this complex legal miracle (The Virgin Birth) but deletes the name associated with it (Immanuel) proves they were tampering with the record. They kept the supernatural power but hid the Jewish Identity and God’s Identity.
PART VII: THE STRATEGIC INTERCEPTION (PILATE'S WIFE)
Timeline: 33 CE (The Trial)
May I remind you that when Satan was at the mountain offering Jesus the world, his primary objective was for Immanuel (the Messiah) to fail by any means. With this in mind, we must examine the dream Pilate's wife had, advising him not to crucify Him.
The "Cui Bono" Test (Who Benefits?) Most theologians assume all supernatural warnings come from God. But who would benefit if Pilate freed the Messiah? By the time of the Trial, Satan realizes he cannot corrupt the Messiah.
The Messiah is sinless. If the sinless Immanuel dies as a sacrifice, the "Debt of Sin" is paid, and Satan loses his legal claim over humanity. The Cross is Satan's defeat.
The "Hail Mary" Play: To survive, Satan must keep the Messiah alive. If Pilate releases Jesus, there is no sacrifice, no blood atonement, and no Resurrection. The prophecy fails.
The Dream: Pilate's wife sends a message: "Have nothing to do with that just man.
If this was God: Why would God try to stop the very sacrifice He planned from the foundation of the world (Isaiah 53)?.
If this was Satan: It makes perfect sense. He is using the wife to manipulate the husband to stop the execution. It was a desperate attempt to abort the Atonement.
Forensic Conclusion: The dream was an act of spiritual warfare designed to save Satan's kingdom, not to save Immanuel.
PART VIII: THE STRATEGIC ESCALATION – A TRILOGY OF FAILURE
Timeline: The Spiritual War Room
To truly understand the crime of the "Name Change," we must step away from the dry pages of history and look at the motive. Why would the Enemy wait nearly three hundred years to execute this specific fraud? A forensic audit of the timeline reveals that the "Erasure of Immanuel" was not the Adversary’s first choice. It was his last resort. If we look closely at the record, we see a pattern of escalation. The Adversary had three distinct strategies to defeat the Messiah, each one more desperate than the last.
The First Plan: Corruption (The Wilderness)
The first attempt was a frontal assault on the character of the King. We see this clearly in the wilderness. Satan did not hide; he came openly to the Messiah and offered Him a deal: "All these kingdoms of the world I will give You, if You will fall down and worship me." This was an attempt to buy Him off. It was a strategy of corruption to offer the Crown without the Cross. If Immanuel had sinned even once, He would have been disqualified as a sacrifice. But Immanuel refused to bow. He remained sinless, and the first plan collapsed.
The Second Plan: Prevention (The Trial)
Having failed to corrupt the Man, the Adversary realized he was in a trap. He could not make Immanuel sin, so he had to stop Immanuel from dying. This brings us back to that strange moment with Pilate’s wife. Many theologians believe this dream was God’s mercy. But I ask you to use your logic: Why would God try to stop the very sacrifice He planned? No, this was not God showing mercy. This was the Enemy showing panic. It was a desperate "Plan B" to abort the Atonement. But this, too, failed. Pilate washed his hands, the innocent blood was shed, and the price was paid in full.
The Third Plan: The Great Identity Theft (The Name Change)
This brings us to the final and most enduring deception. The Adversary was now in a corner. He had failed to corrupt the King, and he had failed to stop the Victory of the Cross. He had lost the legal war for the souls of men. His only remaining option was deception.
The logic was simple: If I cannot stop the Messiah from saving the world, I must trick the world into worshiping the wrong name. He played the long game. He waited for the eyewitnesses the Jewish Apostles to die. He utilized the machinery of the Roman Empire to burn the original Hebrew evidence in 303 CE, ensuring the name "Immanuel" was physically erased from the public consciousness. In its place, he introduced a name that resonated with the Roman frequency: Jes-us.
Critics will tell you that "Jesus" is simply a translation. But if it were an innocent translation, why burn the original Hebrew Gospels? An innocent translator preserves the original for reference; a forger destroys the original to hide the change. The name "Jesus Christ-us" is the artifact of this "Plan C." It is the consolation prize for a defeated enemy. Unable to stop the King from taking the Throne, the Adversary decided to switch the signs on the door. He created a "Roman Mask" for the Jewish Messiah.
PART IX: THE FINAL VERDICT – THE CONSEQUENCE OF THE FRAUD
We have now walked the full timeline of the crime. We have established the motive. We have seen the escalation. The evidence is no longer scattered; it forms a complete, undeniable picture. On one side, we have a Prophecy from God in Isaiah that demands the name Immanuel. On the other side, we have a New Testament that admits this Prophecy exists but produces a different name (Jes-us Christ-us).
Bridging this gap is a history of destruction. We know the original Hebrew records were burned by the Roman state in 303 CE, just years before Constantine merged Paganism with Christianity. We now know this was not random; it was the final move in the "Trilogy of Failure." The Enemy failed to corrupt the Messiah (Plan A) and failed to stop His death (Plan B). The only piece left on the board was "Plan C": the falsification of His identity.
Based on the Unbroken Prophecy, the Internal Contradiction, the Destruction of Evidence, and the Pagan Morphology of the substitute name, we must reach a forensic finding: The Historical Record has been FALSIFIED. This fabrication violates the test of Deuteronomy 18:22. The "thing" spoken by the angel the naming of Jesus did not come to pass in the prophetic record.
The Tragedy of Lost Intimacy
This leads us to the most terrifying question of all: How does this affect us? This is not merely a legal technicality regarding a name; it is a catastrophe of intimacy. When the Enemy changed the name, he fundamentally altered the relationship between the believer and God. The name Immanuel means "God With Us". It describes His Nature. It is a declaration of presence, intimacy, and union.
The name Jesus (Salvation) describes a Function. It describes a service provided.
By swapping the names, the Enemy has downgraded our relationship from "Divine Intimacy" to "Transaction." He has trained the world to relate to the Messiah as a service provider someone who saves rather than experiencing the terrifying and beautiful reality of the Presence of God among us. We have been kept in the outer court, negotiating with a Roman concept, rather than entering the Holy of Holies to meet the Living God.
The Wrong Address Furthermore, the name "Jes-us Christ-us" acts as a "spiritual routing number" that sends worship to the Pagan System, not to the Throne where it is meant to go. The world believes it is praying to the Son of God. In reality, millions are directing their worship to a Roman statue named Jesus.
I have prepared this historical research backed by the Word of God. I must be very careful not to confuse the Word of God with man-made, canonised scripture. I know this evidence is disturbing. I, too, am disturbed by it. But you have an option: You can close your eyes and accept the status quo, or you can prove to yourself whether what you believe is truly in accordance with God’s direct command.
Corrected Verdict: Prayers addressed to Jes-us Christ-us go to the Pagan Construct (the False Son). True prayers must be addressed to Immanuel (the True Son), the one identified by God's original decree in Isaiah .
Jack M Samardzija Brisbane, 10th January 2026 166
Comments